With each the inventory retention system and the contact body I observed an enormous variance in core temperatures. Typically the most popular cores had been 12-13 C increased than the good cores. Additionally, till delidding, cores #5 and #7 had been all the time the most popular two, and cores #0 and #1 had been the good. Lapping the IHS supplied a measurable distinction, though once more not fairly as a lot as anticipated. There was solely a most profit of three C on the most popular cores, however general the vast majority of the cores stayed just a few levels cooler all through the period of the take a look at.
Issues get attention-grabbing with the EKWB Velocity2 Direct Die block. As talked about earlier than, my first take a look at went incorrect instantly and I knew one thing was incorrect. After reapplying the Conductonaut after which remounting the block, the numbers seemed superb. The most well liked core was a full 13 C decrease than inventory and 9 C decrease on the good core. Total I used to be fairly happy with this consequence and felt that the annoyance of the EK mounting system could have been definitely worth the problem. I felt that approach proper as much as testing the Iceman.
There isn’t a have to beat across the bush right here, the Iceman Cooling direct die block has ASTOUNDING efficiency. The bundle temperature was a full 11 C decrease than with the EKWB block. That’s 24 C decrease than inventory below load! Just one core exceeded 80 C, and oddly sufficient, that was core #3, not #5. The most well liked another core hit was 76 C.
I did discover a few attention-grabbing issues when testing the all the info. All three outcomes earlier than delidding pulled over 360 watts most throughout their Cinebench loops. Even though all of the motherboard settings had been unchanged from earlier than (I did double test this) the CPU drew much less energy after delidding. Throughout their R23 loops, I solely measured 356.49 watts whereas utilizing the EKWB block and 350.41 with the Iceman mounted. Additionally, the Iceman outcomes had been the one the place the bundle temp didn’t match the most popular core, however it’s also the one consequence during which the most popular core was not #5. This tells me that the bundle temperature sensor could be very near core 5, or core 5 is the sensor used to report bundle temps.
Discussion about this post