San Francisco made historical past in 2019 when its Board of Supervisors voted to ban city agencies including the police department from using face recognition. About two dozen other US cities have since adopted swimsuit. However on Tuesday San Francisco voters appeared to show in opposition to the thought of proscribing police expertise, backing a poll proposition that can make it simpler for metropolis police to deploy drones and different surveillance instruments.
Proposition E handed with 60 % of the vote and was backed by San Francisco Mayor London Breed. It provides the San Francisco Police Division new freedom to put in public safety cameras and deploy drones with out oversight from the town’s Police Fee or Board of Supervisors. It additionally loosens a requirement that SFPD get clearance from the Board of Supervisors earlier than adopting new surveillance expertise, permitting approval to be sought any time throughout the first 12 months.
Matt Cagle, a senior workers lawyer with ACLU of Northern California, says these adjustments depart the present ban on face recognition in place however loosen different essential protections. “We’re involved that Proposition E will lead to folks in San Francisco being topic to unproven and harmful expertise,” he says. “It is a cynical try by highly effective pursuits to take advantage of fears about crime and shift extra energy to the police.”
Mayor Breed and different backers have positioned it as a solution to concern about crime in San Francisco. Crime figures have broadly declined however fentanyl has not too long ago pushed a rise in overdose deaths and industrial downtown neighborhoods are nonetheless combating pandemic-driven workplace and retail vacancies. The proposition was also supported by teams related to the tech business, together with campaign group GrowSF, which didn’t reply to a request for remark.
“By supporting the work of our cops, increasing our use of expertise and getting officers out from behind their desks and onto our streets, we’ll proceed in our mission to make San Francisco a safer metropolis,” Mayor Breed stated in a press release on the proposition passing. She famous that 2023 noticed the bottom crime charges in a decade within the metropolis—apart from a pandemic blip in 2020—with charges of property crime and violent crime persevering with to say no additional in 2024.
Proposition E additionally provides police extra freedom to pursue suspects in automobile chases and reduces paperwork obligations, together with when officers resort to make use of of power.
Caitlin Seeley George, managing director and marketing campaign director for Struggle for the Future, a nonprofit that has lengthy campaigned in opposition to the usage of face recognition, calls the proposition “a blow to the hard-fought reforms that San Francisco has championed in recent times to rein in surveillance.”
“By increasing police use of surveillance expertise, whereas concurrently lowering oversight and transparency, it undermines peoples’ rights and can create eventualities the place persons are at larger threat of hurt,” George says.
Though Cagle of ACLU shares her issues that San Francisco residents will likely be much less protected, he says the town ought to retain its repute for having catalyzed a US-wide pushback in opposition to surveillance. San Francisco’s 2019 face recognition ban was adopted by round two dozen different cities, lots of which additionally added new oversight mechanisms for police surveillance.
Discussion about this post